Skip to main content

Journal Club

Critical Appraisals

The newest practice-relevant appraisal first, with the full subspecialty archive one click away.

Latest appraisal

2023General Neurosurgeryconsider changehigh evidence

Decompressive Craniectomy versus Craniotomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma

The New England Journal of Medicine | 2023

RESCUE-ASDH trial found no difference in 12-month GOSE outcomes between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma. Craniotomy patients required more reoperations for swelling, while craniectomy patients had more wound complications. When brain allows, consider replacing bone flap to avoid second surgery for cranioplasty.

Practice impact

No significant difference in functional outcomes at 12 months between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma evacuation

Why it matters

  • Craniotomy associated with higher need for additional surgery (14.6% vs 6.9%) p. 8
  • Craniectomy associated with more wound complications (12.2% vs 3.9%) p. 7

At a glance

Published appraisals

66

Subspecialties covered

5

Latest update

Mar 22, 2026

Rapid review note

Journal Club is a rapid, AI-assisted appraisal layer. It highlights study design, effect estimates, and practice relevance, but it is still a briefing, not a replacement for the paper.

For education only. Not medical advice.

Browse by subspecialty

Category archive

Use category pages when you want the full archive; stay on the landing page when you only need the newest signal.

Cerebrovascular20

View all in category →

General Neurosurgery3

View all in category →
2013do not changelow evidence

This 2013 guideline review outlines a stepwise approach to iNPH diagnosis: comprehensive clinical evaluation, treatment of comorbidities, then specific CSF drainage testing. It emphasizes that gait impairment is nearly universal, and properly performed tap tests (30-50 mL removal with pre/post assessment) have high positive predictive value. All symptoms including dementia may improve with shunting in selected patients.

2012consider changemoderate evidence

This RCT in South America found no difference in 6-month functional/cognitive outcomes between ICP monitoring and imaging/clinical exam-based management for severe TBI. Mortality and ICU length of stay were similar. The study challenges the universal necessity of ICP monitoring, suggesting protocolized care without monitoring may be equally effective in certain settings.

2017consider changemoderate evidence

Primary spine tumors require multidisciplinary management at specialized centers. En bloc resection with appropriate margins (Enneking principles) remains standard for most tumors, associated with better local control and survival. Emerging options include denosumab for GCTs, percutaneous ablation for osteoid osteomas, and advanced radiation techniques for chordomas. Treatment decisions must balance oncologic control with morbidity and quality of life.

Tumor/Skull Base32

View all in category →
2026consider changelow evidence

This meta-analysis suggests that awake craniotomy may improve survival, extent of resection, and 3-month neurologic outcomes for selected patients with high-grade glioma, especially in eloquent areas. The catch is that most of the signal comes from observational studies, so read the paper as supportive rather than definitive proof.

2025consider changelow evidence

This consecutive 230-patient vestibular schwannoma microsurgery series says that hearing-preservation surgery can work well in experienced hands, but timing matters. Overall hearing preservation was 61%, it rose to 72% when tumors were 10 mm or smaller, and facial nerve outcomes remained excellent. The result is useful for counseling patients already leaning toward surgery, but it does not compare surgery with observation or radiosurgery.

2012consider changemoderate evidence

This RCT compared early surgery versus continued meds for MTLE within 2 years of drug failure. Surgery yielded 73% seizure freedom at 2 years vs 0% with meds alone (p<0.001). Quality of life improved more with surgery in sensitivity analysis. The trial was stopped early (n=38 vs planned 200), so results are promising but require cautious interpretation due to limited power.

2010consider changemoderate evidence

This UK multicenter RCT compared DBS plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in 366 advanced Parkinson's patients. At 1 year, DBS improved PDQ-39 quality of life scores by 4.7 points more than medical therapy alone, with significant benefits in mobility, ADL, and bodily discomfort domains. However, 19% had serious surgery-related adverse events including one death. DBS provides meaningful quality of life improvement but requires careful patient selection given surgical risks.