Skip to main content

Digest

The Weekly Signal

Published March 1, 2026

Owen briefs you on what matters in this week's digest.

Think chief-resident chalk talk: what matters, what changes practice, and where to spend your reading time.

Endovascular / Vascular

Consider using the four-factor nomogram (age, aneurysm size, platelet aggregation, overlapping devices) to stratify DIPH risk after PED and tailor monitoring accordingly.

Moderate evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Multicenter retrospective cohort study

Population

Patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline Embolization Devices at three institutions (2018-2024)

Intervention

Pipeline Embolization Device treatment

Comparator

None (single-arm risk prediction study)

Primary outcome

Development and validation of nomogram for predicting delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage

Why it matters

Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage (DIPH) after Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) treatment is a devastating but poorly predictable complication. This study provides the first validated nomogram incorporating four key predictors—age, aneurysm maximum diameter, ADP-induced platelet aggregation, and overlapping devices—to quantify individual patient risk. Clinicians could consider using this tool to identify high-risk patients for closer monitoring or modified antiplatelet regimens.

Practice change

May support using a nomogram to identify high-risk patients for closer post-procedural monitoring.

More context

Key details

  • Multicenter retrospective study of 959 PED-treated aneurysm patients (685 training, 274 validation)
  • DIPH incidence was 2.3% in training cohort
  • Age (OR 2.063 per 10 years, p=0.005) and maximum diameter (OR 1.099, p=0.004) increased DIPH risk
  • ADP-induced platelet aggregation (OR 0.896, p<0.001) was protective
  • Overlapping devices carried highest risk (OR 7.226, p=0.007)
  • Nomogram demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility on decision curve analysis
  • Model may help identify high-risk patients for closer monitoring

High-yield

A nomogram using age, aneurysm size, platelet aggregation, and overlapping devices predicted DIPH after PED with AUCs of -, identifying patients at substantially increased risk.

Clinical context

Delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage is a severe complication after pipeline embolization device deployment for intracranial aneurysms. Predictive models for this complication are lacking.

Limitations

Retrospective design limits causal inference and may introduce selection biasExternal validation in broader populations needed to confirm generalizability

Methodological critique

Retrospective design limits causal inference despite rigorous statistical modeling.

Teaching pearl

When planning PED treatment, remember that overlapping devices increase DIPH risk sevenfold—consider this when deciding between single versus multiple devices, especially in older patients with larger aneurysms.

Funding and COI

Not stated

High evidence

Why it matters

Long-term safety and durability data inform device selection and follow-up after endovascular procedures.

Teaching pearl

When applying this evidence, confirm the primary endpoint definition and follow-up time in the full text before changing practice.

More context

High-yield

Systematic review and meta-analysis; pooled effect size in forest plots; heterogeneity and bias assessment.

Consider drug-coated balloons for symptomatic ICAS patients with ≥70% stenosis to potentially reduce restenosis rates.

OConsider drug-coated balloons for symptomatic ICAS patients with ≥70% stenosis to potentially reduce restenosis rates, but remain vigilant for individual patient responses.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Population

Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis ≥70%

Intervention

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs)

Comparator

Conventional balloons and stents

Primary outcome

Restenosis rates

Why it matters

Previously, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) was treated with stenting or conventional balloons, but restenosis and complications remained problematic. This meta-analysis adds evidence that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) significantly reduce restenosis rates compared to conventional balloons (OR=0.24) and stents (OR=0.20) without increasing perioperative adverse events. Clinicians could consider DCBs as a promising alternative for symptomatic ICAS patients with ≥70% stenosis, especially when restenosis is a concern.

Practice change

May support using drug-coated balloons as a preferred endovascular intervention for symptomatic ICAS to reduce restenosis.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies (6 controlled, 16 single-arm) with 1308 patients.
  • In single-arm studies, perioperative stroke and mortality rate was 5.75%.
  • Follow-up stroke and TIA rate was 1.26%.
  • DCBs significantly reduced restenosis vs. conventional balloons (p=0.003) and stents (p<0.001).
  • Heterogeneity was moderate (I²=44% for restenosis).
  • Studies included patients with symptomatic ICAS.
  • Authors call for larger prospective studies to validate findings.

High-yield

Drug-coated balloons significantly reduce restenosis rates compared to conventional balloons (OR=0.24) and stents (OR=0.20) in symptomatic ICAS patients.

Clinical context

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke. Endovascular treatments like stenting face challenges with restenosis and complications.

Limitations

Included studies had moderate heterogeneity (I² up to 44%), suggesting variability in patient populations or protocols.Most evidence comes from single-arm studies, limiting comparative strength.

Methodological critique

Moderate heterogeneity in pooled analyses suggests variability across included studies.

Teaching pearl

When considering endovascular options for symptomatic ICAS, remember that DCBs offer a drug-eluting advantage without a permanent implant—think of them as a 'leave nothing behind' strategy that may cut restenosis by over 75% compared to stents.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Flow diversion for posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Research • Endovascular / Vascular • Journal of neurointerventional surgery • 2026-02-16

Flow diversion can be considered for posterior circulation aneurysms with expected occlusion around , but avoid it for fusiform-dolichoectatic subtypes and counsel patients about the thromboembolic and mortality risks.

OFlow diversion can be a viable option for posterior circulation aneurysms, but clinicians must avoid its use in fusiform-dolichoectatic subtypes due to significantly lower occlusion rates and increased thromboembolic and mortality risks.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Population

Patients with posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters

Intervention

Flow diverter implantation

Comparator

None (single-arm meta-analysis)

Primary outcome

Complete occlusion rate (Raymond-Roy and/or O'Kelly-Marotta scales)

Why it matters

Flow diverters (FDs) are well-established for carotid aneurysms, but their role in posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms has been less clear due to concerns about safety and efficacy. This meta-analysis provides pooled estimates of occlusion rates and complication rates for FD treatment of PC aneurysms across 42 studies and 1,698 patients. Clinicians should consider FD as a viable option for PC aneurysms but exercise caution with fusiform-dolichoectatic subtypes and be prepared for higher thromboembolic and mortality risks compared to carotid applications.

Practice change

May support considering flow diversion for selected posterior circulation aneurysms while avoiding fusiform-dolichoectatic subtypes due to poor occlusion rates.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies
  • 1,698 patients with 1,760 posterior circulation aneurysms

High-yield

Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms achieves a pooled complete occlusion rate of but carries a thromboembolic event rate of and a mortality rate of , with fusiform-dolichoectatic subtypes showing substantially lower occlusion rates of .

Clinical context

Posterior circulation aneurysms are associated with a higher risk of rupture. Flow diverters are widely used for carotid intracranial aneurysms, but their role in PC aneurysms is less established.

Limitations

High heterogeneity across studies (I² values up to 76%) suggests variability in patient populations, devices, and outcome definitionsLack of individual patient data limits adjustment for confounding factors and detailed subgroup analyses

Methodological critique

High statistical heterogeneity across included studies limits the precision of pooled estimates.

Teaching pearl

When considering flow diversion for a posterior circulation aneurysm, remember that while overall occlusion rates are adequate, fusiform-dolichoectatic morphologies respond poorly—have a frank discussion with patients about the nearly 50% failure rate and higher complication profile in these challenging cases.

Funding and COI

Not stated

For large/giant saccular aneurysms, consider adjunctive coiling with flow diverters to potentially improve occlusion rates.

OFor large/giant saccular aneurysms, adding coils to a flow diverter likely improves occlusion rates, but the complication trade-off remains unclear.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Population

Patients with large and giant intracranial aneurysms

Intervention

Flow diverter with adjunctive coiling

Comparator

Flow diverter alone

Primary outcome

Complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification)

Why it matters

Previously, the benefit-risk balance of adding coiling to flow diverters for large/giant intracranial aneurysms was unclear due to conflicting observational data. This meta-analysis provides Level 1 evidence that FD+coiling significantly improves complete occlusion rates in saccular aneurysms, though complication differences remain uncertain. For large/giant saccular aneurysms, surgeons could consider adjunctive coiling with flow diverters to potentially enhance occlusion, while recognizing that complication profiles require further investigation.

Practice change

May support considering adjunctive coiling with flow diverters for large/giant saccular aneurysms to improve occlusion rates.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review/meta-analysis of 15 studies with 1130 patients
  • 557 patients in FD alone group vs 573 in FD+coiling group

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Large and giant intracranial aneurysms pose treatment challenges. The benefit-risk balance of flow diverters alone versus with coiling remains unclear.

Limitations

Observational studies only - no randomized controlled trials includedHigh heterogeneity across included studies in patient selection and techniques

Methodological critique

Limited to observational studies with inherent selection bias and heterogeneity in techniques.

Teaching pearl

When planning FD for large saccular aneurysms, remember that adding coils may boost your occlusion odds by nearly 60%, but weigh this against the still-unclear complication trade-off - particularly for fusiform aneurysms where no benefit was seen.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Tumor / Skull Base

Continue using individualized imaging protocols for vestibular schwannoma management, as evidence remains low-quality and does not support standardized changes.

OContinue individualized imaging protocols for vestibular schwannoma management, as current guidelines are based on low-quality evidence and do not support standardized changes.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review

Population

Patients with vestibular schwannomas

Intervention

Imaging protocols for management

Comparator

None

Primary outcome

Evidence-based recommendations for imaging use

Why it matters

Before this update, imaging protocols for vestibular schwannoma management were based on heterogeneous practices and low-quality evidence from the 2018 guidelines. This systematic review adds a comprehensive evaluation of recent literature (2015-2022), identifying 57 studies to update recommendations. Clinicians should continue using current imaging practices cautiously, as this confirms the need for higher-quality evidence rather than changing protocols.

Practice change

Confirms current practice, highlighting that imaging protocols should remain individualized due to low-quality evidence.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review updating 2018 CNS guidelines for imaging in vestibular schwannoma management.
  • Covered literature from January 1, 2015, to May 20, 2022.
  • Seven clinical questions were formulated; recommendations were updated for six.
  • Most included studies provided level III evidence, with rare level II studies.
  • Recommendations are level III, reflecting low certainty and quality.
  • Highlights variability in treatment philosophies influencing local decision-making.
  • Identifies key areas for future study, including advanced imaging techniques and head-to-head protocol comparisons.

High-yield

This systematic review found that most evidence for imaging in vestibular schwannoma management is level III, leading to level III recommendations due to low certainty and quality.

Clinical context

Imaging is critical for vestibular schwannoma management, but protocols are heterogeneous and based on historical practices or low-quality evidence. This updates 2018 guidelines.

Limitations

Most evidence is level III, limiting the strength of recommendations.Heterogeneity in disease and treatment philosophies may affect generalizability.

Methodological critique

Reliance on predominantly level III evidence limits the strength of the updated recommendations.

Teaching pearl

When ordering imaging for vestibular schwannoma, remember that current guidelines are based on low-quality evidence—so tailor protocols to individual patient factors and institutional expertise rather than relying on rigid standards.

Funding and COI

Not stated

NR

OCounsel patients with vestibular schwannoma that hearing preservation rates decline significantly over 10 years across all treatment modalities, with fewer than half maintaining serviceable hearing.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and clinical practice guideline

Population

Adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma and documented serviceable hearing at diagnosis

Intervention

Observation, stereotactic radiation, or microsurgery

Comparator

None (descriptive review)

Primary outcome

Serviceable hearing preservation rates at 2, 5, and 10 years

Why it matters

Before, hearing preservation outcomes for vestibular schwannoma were based on older data with limited long-term follow-up. This systematic review adds updated pooled estimates showing serviceable hearing declines over time across all modalities: observation (47% at 10 years), radiosurgery (38% at 10 years), and microsurgery (32% at 10 years). Clinicians should now counsel patients that regardless of treatment choice, fewer than half maintain useful hearing by 10 years, with microsurgery and radiosurgery potentially accelerating decline compared to observation.

Practice change

Confirms current practice of counseling patients about declining hearing preservation over time regardless of treatment choice.

More context

Key details

  • Update to 2018 CNS Guideline on hearing preservation in sporadic vestibular schwannoma.
  • Systematic review of studies through May 2022.
  • Pooled estimated rates of serviceable hearing preservation for observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery.

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Given the increasing prevalence and shifting disease demographic of vestibular schwannoma toward smaller tumors in people with less advanced symptoms, increasing emphasis has been placed on functional hearing preservation.

Limitations

Pooled estimates from heterogeneous studies with varying methodologies.Limited high-quality comparative data on treatment modalities.

Methodological critique

Pooled estimates from observational studies with inherent selection biases.

Teaching pearl

When counseling vestibular schwannoma patients about hearing preservation, emphasize the sobering 10-year numbers: even with observation, only 47% keep serviceable hearing, and interventions may accelerate loss.

Funding and COI

Not stated

SRS provides effective tumor control for both VHL-associated and sporadic hemangioblastomas with favorable safety profile, particularly for solid tumors.

Moderate evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

International multicenter retrospective cohort study

Population

Patients with intracranial hemangioblastomas (VHL-associated and sporadic) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

Intervention

Stereotactic radiosurgery for hemangioblastoma

Comparator

None (single-arm outcomes study)

Primary outcome

Local tumor control and SRS-related complications

Why it matters

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes for hemangioblastomas have been described in single-center series with limited comparative data between von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and sporadic cases. This multicenter study provides contemporary evidence that SRS achieves tumor control in approximately 85% of VHL-associated and 76% of sporadic tumors with low complication rates. Clinicians can offer SRS as an effective treatment option for both VHL and sporadic hemangioblastomas, particularly for solid tumors.

Practice change

Confirms current practice of using SRS as an effective treatment option for both VHL-associated and sporadic hemangioblastomas.

More context

Key details

  • International multicenter retrospective study of 104 VHL and 89 sporadic patients
  • 433 VHL-associated and 137 sporadic tumors treated with SRS

High-yield

SRS achieved tumor control in 85% of VHL-associated and of sporadic hemangioblastomas with radiation-induced changes in only - of cases.

Clinical context

Hemangioblastomas are rare benign vascular tumors that may occur sporadically or in association with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Limited data exist regarding factors affecting outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Limitations

Retrospective design across multiple centers introduces potential heterogeneity in treatment protocolsLack of standardized follow-up imaging protocols may affect progression detection

Methodological critique

Retrospective multicenter design may introduce treatment heterogeneity despite large sample size.

Teaching pearl

When considering SRS for hemangioblastomas, remember that cystic tumors in sporadic cases are less likely to be controlled—consider alternative approaches or closer surveillance for these lesions.

Funding and COI

Not stated

The 35-Year Evolution of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Meningiomas.

Research • Tumor / Skull Base • Neurosurgery • 2025-08-22

Low evidence

Why it matters

Guideline and evidence synthesis can standardize diagnostic workup and counseling for skull base tumor patients.

Teaching pearl

When applying this evidence, confirm the primary endpoint definition and follow-up time in the full text before changing practice.

More context

High-yield

Journal article (design NR); resection extent and recurrence; neurological morbidity.

Continue offering hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma patients with good preoperative hearing and counsel those needing microsurgery after radiosurgery about increased risks of subtotal resection and facial nerve dysfunction.

OContinue to offer hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma patients with good preoperative hearing, but ensure thorough counseling regarding the heightened risks of subtotal resection and facial nerve dysfunction for those requiring microsurgery post-radiosurgery.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review for guideline development

Population

Patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas

Intervention

Surgical resection

Comparator

Various surgical approaches and non-surgical management

Primary outcome

Evidence-based recommendations for surgical intervention

Why it matters

The 2018 CNS guidelines provided evidence-based recommendations for surgical resection of vestibular schwannomas, but new literature has emerged since then. This systematic review updates those guidelines by analyzing studies published from 2015 to 2022. The findings confirm current practice: hearing preservation surgery remains an option for patients with good preoperative hearing, and patients needing microsurgical resection after radiosurgery should be counseled about increased risks of subtotal resection and facial nerve dysfunction.

Practice change

Confirms current practice

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review of literature on surgical intervention for vestibular schwannomas
  • Search of PubMed and MEDLINE databases
  • Manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria analyzed for guideline recommendations
  • Updates 2018 CNS Guideline on surgical intervention for sporadic vestibular schwannomas
  • Addresses specific clinical questions with evidence-based recommendations
  • Acknowledges insufficient data for some questions

High-yield

This guideline update confirms that hearing preservation surgery through middle fossa or retrosigmoid approaches may be considered for vestibular schwannoma patients with good preoperative hearing, and microsurgical resection after stereotactic radiosurgery carries increased risks of subtotal resection and facial nerve dysfunction.

Clinical context

Surgical intervention remains an important option in the management of vestibular schwannomas. Development of a systematic approach to choose the most appropriate route for this intervention, based on existing published evidence, is an important goal.

Limitations

The review acknowledges insufficient data were present to create answers for some clinical questionsAs a guideline update, it relies on previously established methodology and may not include all recent studies beyond the search cutoff

Methodological critique

The guideline update process followed established systematic review methodology but acknowledges data gaps for some clinical questions.

Teaching pearl

When discussing surgical options for vestibular schwannoma with a patient who has good preoperative hearing, remember that middle fossa and retrosigmoid approaches for hearing preservation remain valid alternatives to observation—but be prepared to explain that evidence hasn't changed much since 2018.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Incorporate both positive and negative DES data when planning glioma resections near speech areas to better define functional boundaries.

OWhen mapping speech areas, document both positive and negative stimulation sites to define functional boundaries more precisely, as negative points help delineate non-eloquent tissue.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Observational cohort study

Population

25 patients with brain gliomas (17 HGGs/9 LGGs) undergoing awake surgery

Intervention

Intraoperative DES mapping of speech articulation with rs-fMRI connectivity analysis

Comparator

None

Primary outcome

Mapping of speech articulation network boundaries using DES-positive and DES-negative points

Why it matters

Traditional speech articulation mapping has relied on positive DES sites, leaving functional boundaries poorly defined. This study adds negative DES mapping to delineate SAN boundaries with unprecedented accuracy, identifying a 41% threshold that balances sensitivity (~80%) and specificity (~80%). Surgeons could consider incorporating both positive and negative DES data when planning glioma resections near speech areas to better define functional boundaries.

Practice change

Could consider incorporating both positive and negative DES data for more precise speech network boundary definition.

More context

Key details

  • 25 glioma patients (17 HGGs/9 LGGs) undergoing awake surgery
  • 32 DES-positive and 42 DES-negative points analyzed after quality control
  • Seed-based rs-fMRI connectivity analysis from DES sites
  • DES-positive SAN involved bilateral rolandic operculum, inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus
  • DES-negative network distinct from anticorrelated SAN
  • Sensitivity and specificity profiles crossed around 41% threshold
  • Bi-hemispheric distribution observed regardless of language lateralization

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Speech articulation network mapping traditionally uses positive DES sites. The functional boundaries remain poorly defined.

Limitations

Small sample size (n=25) limits generalizabilitySingle-center study with potential institutional bias in DES technique

Methodological critique

Small sample size and single-center design limit statistical power and generalizability.

Teaching pearl

When mapping speech areas, don't just note where stimulation causes arrest - also document where it doesn't, as these negative points help define the actual functional boundaries more precisely than positive points alone.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Spine

FELD is a reasonable alternative to traditional discectomy techniques, offering similar safety with potential advantages in early recovery for selected patients.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Population

Adult patients (≥18 years) with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation without concurrent lumbar spinal stenosis

Intervention

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Comparator

Microdiscectomy, tubular discectomy, or open nonmicroscopic discectomy

Primary outcome

Comparative effectiveness across adverse effects, operative parameters, hospital stay, and clinical indices

Why it matters

The comparative effectiveness of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) versus traditional techniques has been unclear despite technological advancements. This meta-analysis suggests FELD offers advantages in short-term pain relief and faster mobilization while maintaining comparable safety profiles. Surgeons could consider FELD as a viable option for selected patients, particularly when early recovery is prioritized, though more robust trials are needed.

Practice change

Could consider FELD as a viable option for selected patients when early recovery is prioritized, given comparable safety profiles.

More context

Key details

  • Meta-analysis of studies comparing FELD with microdiscectomy, tubular discectomy, or open discectomy
  • Included adult patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation without concurrent stenosis
  • Studies published between 2013-2024 from multiple databases
  • Quality assessment using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
  • FELD showed advantages in operative parameters and clinical indices
  • Limited number of prospective trials included
  • Authors call for more well-designed prospective randomized trials
  • Need for comprehensive cost analyses including societal costs

High-yield

FELD provides comparable recurrence, reoperation, and complication rates to traditional techniques while offering advantages in short-term pain relief and faster patient mobilization.

Clinical context

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy has gained attention as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional techniques, but it remains unclear whether it offers definitive advantages over traditional methods.

Limitations

Substantial heterogeneity across studies limits definitive conclusionsLimited number of prospective randomized trials included in analysis

Methodological critique

Substantial heterogeneity across included studies limits the strength of pooled conclusions.

Teaching pearl

When discussing surgical options for lumbar disc herniation, remember that FELD offers comparable safety to traditional techniques but may get patients mobilized faster—consider this for patients where rapid return to activity is a priority.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Counsel patients that lumbar UESS carries approximately 10% complication risk, with dural tears and nerve injuries being most common.

OUESS carries a ~10% complication risk, so focus your technical refinement on preventing dural tears and nerve injuries.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

Population

Adult patients undergoing lumbar uniportal endoscopic spine surgery

Intervention

Lumbar UESS for various spinal pathologies

Comparator

None

Primary outcome

Overall and specific complication rates

Why it matters

UESS complication rates have been reported variably from 0-30%, creating uncertainty about its safety profile. This meta-analysis establishes a pooled overall complication rate of 9.79% with dural tears (3.75%) and nerve palsy (2.69%) as most common. Surgeons can now counsel patients with more precise complication estimates and focus technical refinement on preventing dural tears and nerve injuries.

Practice change

Confirms current practice with more precise complication estimates for patient counseling and technical focus.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review/proportional meta-analysis of 21 studies (1258 patients)
  • Follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 26.5 months

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

UESS offers reduced tissue damage and faster recovery but has a steep learning curve with complication rates reported between 0% and 30%.

Limitations

High heterogeneity in overall complication rates (I²=65.5%)Predominantly retrospective studies from limited geographic regions

Methodological critique

High heterogeneity across studies suggests variable patient selection, surgical techniques, and complication reporting.

Teaching pearl

When starting UESS, anticipate that nearly 1 in 10 cases will have a complication, with dural tears being your most likely challenge - factor this into your consent discussions and focus your technical refinement on dural protection and nerve visualization.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Support well-designed, multistep school screening programs for AIS to enable early bracing intervention, reduce fusion rates by 73%, and achieve cost savings.

OWhen evaluating a positive school screening for scoliosis, remember that the low positive predictive value means many referrals are false positives—so use a multistep protocol with clinical exam and radiography only when indicated to avoid unnecessary radiation.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Population

Asymptomatic pupils aged 10 to 16 screened at school for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Intervention

School-based screening programs

Comparator

Usual care (no screening)

Primary outcome

Prevalence, diagnostic performance, clinical impact, and cost burden

Why it matters

Previously, school screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was controversial due to concerns about false positives, radiation, and cost. This meta-analysis adds pooled data from 34 studies covering 2.8 million pupils, showing screening detects curves at milder stages (mean Cobb 28° vs. 40° in usual care) with 73% lower fusion odds and potential net savings. Clinicians should advocate for well-designed, multistep screening programs to optimize early detection and reduce surgical burden.

Practice change

May support implementing or advocating for structured school screening programs to reduce progression and surgical rates in AIS.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies covering 2.8 million pupils aged 10-16.
  • Screening tests had high negative predictive value (approaching 100%) and variable positive predictive value (4% to 80%).
  • Numbers needed to screen to start bracing ranged from 448 to 2234.
  • Costs were $0.47 to $55 per pupil, with most economic models predicting net savings.
  • Screen-detected adolescents had significantly lower Cobb angles and fusion rates.
  • Highlights need for standardized programs to minimize unnecessary referrals and radiation.
  • Authors note wide variations in prevalence, methods, and cost frameworks.

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Routine screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis aims to detect curves before skeletal maturity for bracing, but controversy exists over false positives, radiation, and cost.

Limitations

High heterogeneity in screening methods and cost frameworks across studies.Wide ranges in test performance (e.g., PPV 4% to 80%) indicate variability in program effectiveness.

Methodological critique

High heterogeneity across studies in screening methods and economic evaluations limits generalizability.

Teaching pearl

When evaluating a positive school screening for scoliosis, remember that the low PPV means many referrals are false positives—so use a multistep protocol with clinical exam and radiography only when indicated to avoid unnecessary radiation.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Use the pooled complication rates from this meta-analysis ( overall, dural tears, nerve injuries) to counsel patients undergoing tubular minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery, while recognizing that individual risk varies with patient factors and surgeon experience.

OUse the pooled complication rates from this meta-analysis to inform patient discussions about tubular minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery, while emphasizing that individual risks may vary based on patient-specific factors and surgeon expertise.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

Population

Adult patients undergoing tubular minimally invasive spine surgery for lumbar pathologies

Intervention

Tubular minimally invasive spine surgery

Comparator

None (single-arm meta-analysis)

Primary outcome

Complication rates (overall and specific)

Why it matters

Tubular minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is popular for lumbar pathologies due to reduced tissue disruption, but complication rates have been inconsistently reported across studies. This proportional meta-analysis provides pooled estimates of specific complication rates from 75 studies involving approximately 12,600 patients over the past decade. Clinicians can use these rates for more accurate patient counseling and surgical planning, recognizing that overall complication rates are generally low but vary by complication type.

Practice change

Could consider using these pooled complication rates for more accurate patient counseling and surgical planning for tubular MISS procedures.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
  • Studies from January 2013 to March 2024
  • Included studies with ≥10 adult patients undergoing tubular lumbar MISS
  • Random-effects model used for pooling complication rates
  • Study quality assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

High-yield

Tubular minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery has an overall complication rate of , with dural tears occurring in of cases, nerve injuries in , and revision surgeries in .

Clinical context

Tubular MISS is widely used for lumbar pathologies due to its reduced tissue disruption and faster recovery compared with open surgery. However, reported complication rates vary, and pooled estimates for specific complications remain limited.

Limitations

High statistical heterogeneity across studies (I² up to 93%) suggests substantial variability in patient populations, surgical techniques, and outcome definitionsAs a proportional meta-analysis of single-arm studies, it lacks comparative data against open surgery or other minimally invasive techniques

Methodological critique

High statistical heterogeneity across included studies limits the precision of pooled estimates.

Teaching pearl

When consenting a patient for tubular MISS, quote the 10% overall complication rate but break it down: emphasize that dural tears are the most common at 4%, while serious nerve injuries and infections are around 1%—these numbers help set realistic expectations while highlighting the procedure's generally favorable safety profile.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Functional

NR

OIncorporate the validated ESP-ESSQ_19 questionnaire into routine follow-up for Spanish-speaking epilepsy surgery patients to assess quality of life and patient satisfaction beyond seizure control.

Moderate evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Multicenter prospective cohort study

Population

Adult patients from Spanish-speaking countries who underwent epilepsy surgery at least 1 year prior

Intervention

Spanish translation, adaptation, and validation of the Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire-19 (ESP-ESSQ_19)

Comparator

None (validation study)

Primary outcome

Psychometric properties of ESP-ESSQ_19 including internal consistency and test-retest reliability

Why it matters

Previously, patient satisfaction after epilepsy surgery was often overlooked in favor of seizure control metrics alone. This study provides a validated Spanish-language tool (ESP-ESSQ_19) with adequate psychometric properties for systematically assessing patient-reported outcomes. Clinicians could consider incorporating this questionnaire into routine follow-up to better capture the holistic impact of surgery beyond seizure freedom.

Practice change

Could consider incorporating the validated ESP-ESSQ_19 questionnaire into routine follow-up for Spanish-speaking epilepsy surgery patients to assess patient-reported outcomes.

More context

Key details

  • Prospective multicenter study across five Spanish-speaking countries
  • Adult patients who underwent epilepsy surgery ≥1 year prior
  • Temporal lobe epilepsy was most common (77.8%)
  • Structural etiology predominated (95.2%)
  • 68.7% of patients were seizure-free for ≥1 year at inclusion
  • 94 patients completed both baseline and follow-up questionnaires
  • Median time since surgery was 3 years (IQR 1-7)

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

The effectiveness of epilepsy surgery is often focused exclusively on seizure control. The ESSQ-19 is a reliable tool for assessing patient satisfaction after epilepsy surgery.

Limitations

Single-language validation limits generalizability to non-Spanish speaking populationsNo comparison to other satisfaction measures beyond correlation with validated questionnaires

Methodological critique

The study followed rigorous translation/back-translation methodology but lacks comparison to other satisfaction measures beyond correlation with validated questionnaires.

Teaching pearl

When following epilepsy surgery patients, remember that seizure freedom doesn't equal patient satisfaction—use validated tools like ESP-ESSQ_19 to systematically assess quality of life domains that matter to your Spanish-speaking patients.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor.

Research • Functional • Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery • 2025-09-24

For essential tremor patients with significant procedural anxiety, asleep MRI-guided DBS targeting VIM offers excellent tremor control with minimal targeting error.

OFor anxious ET patients, asleep MRI-guided VIM DBS offers comparable tremor control to awake surgery with submillimeter accuracy, making it a viable alternative to avoid the stress of intraoperative testing.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Retrospective chart review

Population

Essential tremor patients undergoing DBS under general anesthesia using MRI-guided ClearPoint technique

Intervention

Interventional MRI-guided DBS lead placement under general anesthesia

Comparator

None (single-arm retrospective study)

Primary outcome

Clinical outcomes including medication reduction, FTM tremor rating scale, and QUEST quality of life questionnaire

Why it matters

Traditional DBS for essential tremor requires awake surgery with intraoperative testing, which can be challenging for patients with anxiety or medical comorbidities. This retrospective study demonstrates that asleep MRI-guided DBS targeting the VIM nucleus yields excellent tremor control (69.2% stopped or reduced medication) with minimal radial error (0.43 mm). For appropriately selected ET patients with anxiety about awake surgery, consider discussing asleep MRI-guided DBS as a viable alternative that maintains efficacy.

Practice change

May support offering asleep MRI-guided DBS as an alternative for ET patients with significant anxiety about traditional awake surgery.

More context

Key details

  • Retrospective review of 113 ET patients (175 leads) at a community health system
  • Interventional MRI-guided ClearPoint technique under general anesthesia
  • Targeting ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) for essential tremor
  • Only 2 leads required more than one pass
  • Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire improved from 47.1 to 29.4
  • Mean age 68.1 ± 9.4 years, 44.2% female
  • Procedure performed between 2016-2021 by single surgeon

High-yield

Asleep MRI-guided DBS for essential tremor achieved 69.2% medication reduction/cessation with submillimeter targeting accuracy (0.43 mm radial error).

Clinical context

DBS was FDA-approved for essential tremor in 1997. Interventional MRI-guided DBS lead placement is an emerging technique for ET patients.

Limitations

Retrospective design without control group for comparison to awake DBSSingle-surgeon, single-institution experience limits generalizability

Methodological critique

Retrospective design without control group limits causal inference about comparative effectiveness.

Teaching pearl

When counseling anxious ET patients about DBS, remember that asleep MRI-guided targeting can achieve submillimeter accuracy comparable to awake techniques—don't let anxiety alone exclude someone from potentially life-changing tremor control.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Consider using interictal HFO and PAC biomarker analysis to guide RNS electrode placement for potentially better outcomes.

OConsider incorporating interictal high-frequency oscillations and phase-amplitude coupling analyses for RNS electrode placement to potentially enhance seizure outcomes.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Population

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent iEEG monitoring and subsequent RNS implantation

Intervention

RNS electrode placement guided by interictal HFOs and delta-HFO PAC distribution

Comparator

Conventional seizure onset zone (SOZ)-based targeting

Primary outcome

≥50% seizure reduction at last follow-up

Why it matters

Previously, RNS electrode placement relied primarily on seizure onset zone (SOZ) localization, which doesn't always correlate with optimal stimulation targets. This study suggests that interictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and delta-HFO phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) can serve as spatial biomarkers to guide RNS targeting, with weighted median distances within 20-30 mm from stimulation sites to peak biomarker locations predicting better outcomes. Clinicians could consider incorporating these open-source biomarker analyses when planning RNS electrode placement, especially in cases where SOZ targeting is ambiguous.

Practice change

May support incorporating interictal HFO and PAC biomarker analysis using open-source tools when planning RNS electrode placement, particularly when SOZ targeting is ambiguous.

More context

Key details

  • Retrospective study of 18 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent iEEG monitoring and subsequent RNS implantation
  • Inclusion required ≥60 min of slow-wave sleep iEEG data and ≥6 months post-RNS follow-up

High-yield

Weighted median distances from RNS electrodes to peak HFO and PAC sites were significantly shorter in the good outcome group (p<.0001), suggesting better targeting.

Clinical context

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is used for drug-resistant epilepsy, but optimal electrode targeting remains challenging. Interictal biomarkers like high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) may offer improved localization.

Limitations

Retrospective design with small sample size (n=18) limits generalizabilityExclusion of patients with simultaneous/resective surgery or exclusively thalamic electrodes may introduce selection bias

Methodological critique

Small sample size and retrospective design limit the strength of conclusions despite statistically significant findings.

Teaching pearl

When reviewing iEEG for RNS planning, don't just map the SOZ—run the open-source HFO and PAC analyses on slow-wave sleep segments; placing electrodes within 20-30 mm of those biomarker peaks might give your patient a better shot at meaningful seizure reduction.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Low evidence

Why it matters

Functional neurosurgery and epilepsy surgery evidence can inform patient selection and counseling about cognitive outcomes.

Teaching pearl

When applying this evidence, confirm the primary endpoint definition and follow-up time in the full text before changing practice.

More context

High-yield

Journal article (design NR), N=59; seizure freedom or symptom control; cognitive and functional side effects.

General Neurosurgery

Decompressive craniectomy versus best medical treatment alone for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Research • General Neurosurgery • International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society • 2025-08-05

For select patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, decompressive craniectomy may reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes compared to medical management alone.

ODecompressive craniectomy may be beneficial for select patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage by reducing mortality and improving functional outcomes, but clinicians should temper expectations regarding independence due to the variability in outcomes.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis

Population

Patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

Intervention

Decompressive craniectomy

Comparator

Best medical treatment alone

Primary outcome

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality at multiple time points, length of hospital stay

Why it matters

Previously, the role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) was uncertain, with limited high-quality evidence comparing it to best medical treatment (BMT) alone. This meta-analysis of 743 patients demonstrates that DC is associated with reduced mortality and improved functional outcomes compared to BMT alone. Neurosurgeons should consider DC as a viable option for select sICH patients, particularly those at high risk of mortality, while awaiting more definitive randomized trials.

Practice change

May support considering decompressive craniectomy more readily for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients, particularly those at high mortality risk.

More context

Key details

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing DC to BMT alone for sICH
  • DC associated with reduced mortality at 30 days (OR=0.36), 90 days (OR=0.35), and last follow-up (OR=0.33)
  • DC improved rates of good neurological function (mRS 0-4) with OR=2.29
  • BMT alone associated with poor neurological function (mRS 5-6) with OR=0.44

High-yield

Decompressive craniectomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage reduces mortality (OR=0.33 at last follow-up) and improves functional outcomes (OR=2.29 for mRS 0-) compared to best medical treatment alone.

Clinical context

Managing spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage remains challenging despite advances. Recent studies suggest decompressive craniectomy may offer benefits over conservative treatment in certain cases.

Limitations

Heterogeneity in included studies (both randomized and observational designs) may introduce selection biasHigh statistical heterogeneity for some outcomes (I² up to 92.9% for length of stay)

Methodological critique

The inclusion of both randomized and observational studies introduces potential selection bias despite statistical adjustments.

Teaching pearl

When considering DC for sICH, focus on mortality reduction and functional improvement rather than expecting excellent outcomes (mRS 0-2), as the data shows clear benefit for preventing poor outcomes but less certainty for achieving independence.

Funding and COI

Not stated

NR

OIn managing hydrocephalus due to methylmalonic acidemia, prioritize optimizing metabolic control for at least one month and avoid shunt placement before 4.5 months of age to reduce revision rates and improve quality of life.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Population

Patients with methylmalonic acidemia (MMA)-related hydrocephalus

Intervention

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) surgery

Comparator

Medical management without surgery

Primary outcome

Optimal timing of surgical intervention and health-related quality of life

Why it matters

Hydrocephalus is a known but poorly characterized complication of methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), with limited evidence on surgical management timing and outcomes. This retrospective study identifies MMA as the fourth most common cause of pediatric hydrocephalus and provides concrete cutoff values for surgical decision-making: Evans index >0.45 indicates need for VPS, while delaying surgery beyond 1 month of drug treatment and 4.5 months of age may reduce revision rates. For patients requiring VPS, consider delaying surgery when possible to optimize metabolic control and reduce complications, as earlier intervention correlated with higher revision rates and worse quality of life.

Practice change

Could consider delaying VPS surgery beyond 4.5 months of age and after at least 1 month of optimized metabolic treatment when managing MMA-related hydrocephalus, based on reduced revision rates and better quality of life outcomes.

More context

Key details

  • Retrospective study of 77 patients with MMA-related hydrocephalus followed for 2-10 years
  • MMA was fourth most common hydrocephalus etiology among 1671 cases
  • 66 patients (85.7%) required VPS surgery; 11 (14.3%) responded to medical treatment alone
  • Evans index cutoff of 0.45 differentiated VPS vs non-VPS groups (p<.001)
  • 24.7% required revision surgery; shorter drug treatment (<1 month) and younger surgical age (<4.5 months) predicted revisions
  • Revision group had lower Evans index and worse quality of life scores
  • Non-VPS group had superior PedsQL scores across all domains compared to VPS group

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Hydrocephalus is a rare complication of methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), an inherited metabolic disorder. Optimal timing of surgical intervention remains unclear.

Limitations

Retrospective single-center design limits generalizability5 patients excluded due to incomplete data and 7 lost to follow-up may introduce bias

Methodological critique

Retrospective design with potential selection bias due to exclusions and loss to follow-up.

Teaching pearl

When managing MMA-related hydrocephalus, don't rush to shunt—get that Evans index and optimize metabolic control for at least a month; surgery before 4.5 months of age nearly doubles the revision risk and significantly impacts quality of life.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Long-term Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Motor Cortex for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Headaches.

Research • General Neurosurgery • Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society • 2025-10-19

Consider referring patients with persistent MTBI-related headaches for a trial of ten-session rTMS targeting the left motor cortex, as it may reduce headache burden and improve cognitive function for up to three months.

High evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Population

Patients with mild traumatic brain injury-related headaches

Intervention

Ten sessions of active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10 Hz) at left motor cortex

Comparator

Sham rTMS

Primary outcome

Reduction in persistent headache frequency and debilitating headache duration

Why it matters

Persistent headaches after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) are common and debilitating, with limited effective treatments previously available. This RCT demonstrates that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the left motor cortex significantly reduces headache frequency and duration, with improvements in cognitive and mood symptoms. Clinicians could consider rTMS as a non-invasive option for MTBI-related headaches, focusing on a protocol of ten sessions to achieve sustained benefits over several months.

Practice change

Could consider rTMS as a non-invasive treatment option for patients with MTBI-related headaches who have not responded to conventional therapies.

More context

Key details

  • Double-blind, randomized controlled trial in patients with MTBI-related headaches.
  • Active rTMS (10 Hz) delivered to left motor cortex under MRI-based neuronavigation.
  • Assessments included headache, cognitive, and mood measures up to three months post-treatment.
  • Mixed effect model showed significant reduction in headache frequency and duration.
  • Improvements observed in daily activity interference, concentration, attention, word processing speed, and recall accuracy.
  • Treatment may cause mild transient headache exacerbation without maintenance intervention.
  • Clinical trial registered as NCT03314584.

High-yield

Active rTMS significantly reduces persistent headache frequency and debilitating headache duration up to three months post-treatment, with p<0.001, offering a non-pharmacologic option for MTBI-related headaches.

Clinical context

Persistent headaches are common and debilitating in mild traumatic brain injury populations, often associated with neuropsychologic dysfunction. This trial assessed rTMS for reducing headache symptoms and impairments.

Limitations

Sample size and specific population details (e.g., N, demographics) are not extracted, limiting generalizability.Lack of long-term follow-up beyond three months to assess durability of effects without maintenance.

Methodological critique

The double-blind, randomized design strengthens internal validity, but unreported sample size limits assessment of power and generalizability.

Teaching pearl

For residents managing MTBI headaches, remember that ten sessions of left motor cortex rTMS can cut headache frequency and boost cognition—think of it as a neuromodulatory 'reset' for post-concussive circuits.

Funding and COI

Not stated

For firearm pTBI patients, especially those with unreactive pupils, consider transfer to centers with greater surgical experience when logistically feasible.

OFor patients with firearm pTBI, especially those with unreactive pupils, consider transfer to a high-volume surgical center when feasible, as it is associated with significantly lower mortality.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Population

Adult patients with firearm-related penetrating traumatic brain injury

Intervention

Treatment at hospitals with different cranial surgery tendencies

Comparator

Hospitals stratified into quartiles based on surgical tendency (Q1 lowest to Q4 highest)

Primary outcome

Inpatient mortality

Why it matters

Firearm-related penetrating TBI has high mortality, but optimal surgical management remains controversial with limited evidence. This retrospective cohort study found substantial interhospital variation in cranial surgery rates (0%-71%) and showed that treatment at high-surgery hospitals (quartile 4) was associated with 39% lower odds of mortality compared to low-surgery hospitals. For patients with unreactive pupils—who showed amplified survival benefit at high-surgery hospitals—consider transferring to centers with greater surgical experience when feasible.

Practice change

Could consider transferring firearm pTBI patients, particularly those with unreactive pupils, to centers with higher surgical experience when transfer is feasible.

More context

Key details

  • Retrospective cohort study using ACS TQIP database
  • 4,895 adult patients with firearm-related penetrating TBI
  • 309 hospitals included, median patient age 31 years
  • Median cranial surgery rate 21% across hospitals
  • Hospitals stratified into quartiles by surgical tendency
  • Propensity score matching used to compare quartiles
  • Effect modification by pupillary reactivity tested

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Firearm-related penetrating traumatic brain injury carries a high mortality risk and grim prognosis. This study aimed to quantify interhospital variation in operative intervention.

Limitations

Retrospective design cannot establish causality between surgical tendency and survivalLack of granular clinical data on individual patient decision-making

Methodological critique

Retrospective design using administrative data limits clinical granularity and causal inference.

Teaching pearl

When a GSW to the head rolls in, remember that centers with higher surgical rates show better survival—especially for those fixed pupils. This doesn't mean operate on everyone, but suggests experience matters.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Fetal ETV shows promise in animal models for reducing ventricular dilatation in congenital hydrocephalus, but human application requires further investigation.

OFetal endoscopic third ventriculostomy shows potential in lamb models for congenital hydrocephalus, but clinicians should approach human applications with caution due to significant anatomical and physiological differences.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Preclinical animal study

Population

Fetal lambs with BioGlue-induced obstructive hydrocephalus

Intervention

Fetal endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV)

Comparator

Hydrocephalus without treatment and normal controls

Primary outcome

Lateral ventricular diameter reduction and brain mantle thickness improvement

Why it matters

Fetal endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has been proposed as a prenatal treatment for congenital hydrocephalus, but evidence for its efficacy has been limited. This preclinical study suggests that fetal ETV can reduce ventricular dilatation and improve brain mantle thickness in a lamb model of induced hydrocephalus. Clinicians should view these findings as preliminary evidence supporting further investigation of fetal ETV in human trials.

Practice change

May support further investigation of fetal ETV in human trials for congenital hydrocephalus, but does not change current clinical practice.

More context

Key details

  • Animal study using fetal lamb model of BioGlue-induced obstructive hydrocephalus

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

Fetal interventions for congenital hydrocephalus have evolved since the 1980s, with fetal imaging improvements enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Ventricular shunting in newborns improves outcomes in obstructive hydrocephalus.

Limitations

Preclinical animal model with uncertain translation to human fetal physiologySmall sample sizes in treatment subgroups (n=4-10 per subgroup)

Methodological critique

The study uses a well-characterized animal model but has small subgroup sample sizes and uncertain translational relevance to human fetal surgery.

Teaching pearl

When considering fetal interventions for hydrocephalus, remember that animal models like this lamb study provide proof-of-concept but require cautious interpretation—human fetal anatomy, CSF dynamics, and surgical risks differ substantially.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Basic Science

Low evidence

Why it matters

Mechanistic work may identify targets that later translate into neurosurgical oncology or neuroregeneration therapies.

Teaching pearl

When applying this evidence, confirm the primary endpoint definition and follow-up time in the full text before changing practice.

More context

High-yield

Basic science (preclinical); mechanistic endpoints in methods; not applicable (preclinical).

NR

OIn IDH-mutant glioma cases, consider that mutant IDH inhibitors like DS-1001b target the oncometabolite 2-HG and may reverse epigenetic dysregulation—monitor for emerging clinical trial data.

Low evidencePractice changing

Study snapshot

Design

Preclinical basic science study

Population

IDH1 R132H-mutant glioma cell lines and mouse xenograft models

Intervention

DS-1001b (mutant IDH1 inhibitor) administration

Comparator

Vehicle control

Primary outcome

Survival in xenograft models, 2-HG reduction, epigenetic changes

Why it matters

IDH1 mutations drive glioma through D-2-HG production and epigenetic dysregulation, but effective targeted therapies remain limited. This preclinical study shows DS-1001b, a brain-penetrant mutant IDH1 inhibitor, reduces 2-HG, prolongs survival in xenografts, and reverses epigenetic changes. While not yet clinical, these findings support further development of DS-1001b as a potential therapy for IDH-mutant gliomas.

Practice change

Confirms current preclinical research direction for IDH-mutant glioma therapies but does not change clinical practice.

More context

Key details

  • Preclinical study of DS-1001b, a brain-penetrant oral IDH1 inhibitor
  • Targets IDH1 R132H and R132C mutations
  • Tested in IDH1 R132H-mutant glioma cell lines and xenograft models
  • Reduced 2-HG levels in vitro and in vivo
  • Prolonged survival in A1074 and BT142 intracranial xenografts
  • Partially reversed genome-wide DNA hypermethylation with prolonged exposure
  • H3K4me3 modulation linked to differential gene expression
  • Metabolomic changes included reduced asparagine levels
  • Affected apoptosis, necrosis, cell cycle, and migration pathways

High-yield

NR

Clinical context

IDH1 mutations produce D-2-HG, driving glioma through epigenetic dysregulation. This study investigated the antitumor effects of DS-1001b, a mutant IDH1 inhibitor.

Limitations

Preclinical mouse models may not fully recapitulate human glioma biologyShort-term effects and optimal dosing schedules require further investigation

Methodological critique

Preclinical models limit direct translation to human patients without clinical trial validation.

Teaching pearl

In IDH-mutant glioma cases, consider that mutant IDH inhibitors like DS-1001b target the oncometabolite 2-HG and may reverse epigenetic dysregulation—monitor for emerging clinical trial data.

Funding and COI

Not stated

Low evidence

Why it matters

Mechanistic work may identify targets that later translate into neurosurgical oncology or neuroregeneration therapies.

Teaching pearl

When applying this evidence, confirm the primary endpoint definition and follow-up time in the full text before changing practice.

More context

High-yield

Basic science (preclinical); mechanistic endpoints in methods; not applicable (preclinical).

Trials to Know

Why it matters

This recruiting trial may offer eligible patients access to novel interventions.

Achieving a Better Outcome Through Limiting the Glioblastoma Clinical Target Volume

Trial • Trials to Know • ClinicalTrials.gov • 2026-03-01

Why it matters

This recruiting trial may offer eligible patients access to novel interventions.

Why it matters

This recruiting trial may offer eligible patients access to novel interventions.

Feasibility of Intraoperative Tracing of Meningioma Using [Cu64]DOTATATE

Trial • Trials to Know • ClinicalTrials.gov • 2026-03-01

Why it matters

This recruiting trial may offer eligible patients access to novel interventions.

Why it matters

This recruiting trial may offer eligible patients access to novel interventions.

A Phase I/II Study of IVONESCIMAB in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Trial • Trials to Know • ClinicalTrials.gov • 2026-03-01

Why it matters

This recruiting trial may offer eligible patients access to novel interventions.

From the Preprint Wire

Machine Learning with Cerebrovascular Morphology Predicts Post-Thrombectomy Complications

Preprint • From the Preprint Wire • medrxiv • 2026-02-17

Why it matters

This preprint presents a machine-learning approach that integrates quantitative cerebrovascular morphology with clinical data to predict complications like neurological deterioration, hemorrhage, and malignant edema after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. If validated, this could help neurosurgeons identify high-risk patients earlier for targeted monitoring and intervention, potentially improving outcomes. However, as an unreviewed preprint, these findings require confirmation through peer review and external validation.

Why it matters

This preprint identifies novel genetic associations in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), which is highly relevant to neurosurgeons as it accounts for approximately 20% of strokes and nearly half of vascular dementia cases. If validated, these findings could improve diagnostic yield and potentially guide management for patients with unexplained CSVD, though it is crucial to note this is an unreviewed preprint requiring confirmation.

More context

Key details

  • Analysis focused on patients negative for pathogenic variants in seven well-characterized CSVD genes (NOTCH3, HTRA1, COL4A1, COL4A2, TREX1, GLA, FOXC1).
  • Identified 18 candidate disease-causing variants across nine CSVD-associated genes and significant burdens in ABCC6, MYH11, and NOTCH1.
  • Found novel associations for seven genes (COL7A1, HMCN1, LAMA1, MMP9, TENM4, TNC, TTN) with monogenic CSVD, highlighting potential new diagnostic targets.

Interictal Mini-Seizures as a Continuum of Epileptic Network Dynamics

Preprint • From the Preprint Wire • medrxiv • 2026-02-16

Why it matters

This preprint proposes a novel framework where 'mini-seizures'—brief interictal hypersynchronous events—represent a continuum with overt seizures, driven by the same epileptogenic network. For neurosurgeons, this could refine presurgical mapping by identifying key network hubs from interictal data alone, potentially improving resection planning and outcomes in epilepsy surgery. However, as an unreviewed preprint, these findings require validation before clinical application.